Comments for processi

Comment on rufus-tokyo 0.1.5, hail to the Tyrant by Tokyo Cabinet: Beyond Key-Value Store - igvita.com

Tokyo Cabinet: Beyond Key-Value Store - igvita.com — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:44:58 +0000

[...] of the project, is actively maintaining the Tokyo Cabinet (rdoc) and Tokyo Tyrant (rdoc) libraries. John Mettraux is working on a FFI-backed, and arguably much more Ruby friendly version: rufus-tokyo, and Makoto Inoue has a prototype [...]

Comment on posting to wordpress via ruby and atompub by raveendran

raveendran — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:30:46 +0000

Hi John,

Ok Thanks.

Comment on posting to wordpress via ruby and atompub by John Mettraux

John Mettraux — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:28:19 +0000

I’m sorry P. Raveendran, I haven’t re-used this code for a while.

I suggest you look at the Atom spec (http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/rfc5023.html) to see how you can do that.

Sorry again,

John

Comment on posting to wordpress via ruby and atompub by raveendran

raveendran — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:25:36 +0000

Hi,

Its working fine. Please help me to upload images and give set the path of that image in Content.

I have changed the code and had set manually titles and contents.

I need to upload one image and need to show that image in content page.

Awaiting your reply,
P.Raveendran
jazzezravi@gmail.com

Comment on rufus-tokyo 1.0.1 by John Mettraux

John Mettraux — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:32:06 +0000

Hello Edvin,

it already exists, you’ll find it at

http://github.com/actsasflinn/ruby-tokyotyrant

It’s mentioned in the slides at

http://jmettraux.wordpress.com/2009/07/28/edo-cabinet-rubykaigi2009/

Best regards,

Comment on rufus-tokyo 1.0.1 by Edvin Aghanian

Edvin Aghanian — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:29:43 +0000

Hi John,

First, let me say thank you for this wonderful library.

I’m a bit confused about the Rufus::Edo implementation. In you post above you state:

“It also feature a Rufus::Edo side where the native ruby/c extensions provided by the TC/TT author are used (for speed) instead of ruby-ffi.”

But the GitHub repo has some different info:
http://github.com/jmettraux/rufus-tokyo/tree/master/lib/rufus/edo/

== Rufus::Edo::NetTyrant

Note : ‘NetTyrant’ instead of ‘Tyrant’ to clearly show that this class isn’t a C binding but a simple [pure Ruby]
network implementation of a connection to a Tyrant.

It seems that there does not yet seem to be a Rufus::Edo::Tyrant implementation that binds the Tyrant C libraries without FFI. Will there be one in the future?

Thanks very much for your time.

Edvin

Comment on ruby, twitter, growl by John Mettraux

John Mettraux — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:57:47 +0000

Very cool !

Comment on ruby, twitter, growl by David Edmiston

David Edmiston — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:57:03 +0000

Just wanted to thank you for posting this — I was able to modify it into a highly useful little script that uses Prowl to push notifications about @replies to my iPhone. :)

Comment on state machine != workflow engine by John Mettraux

John Mettraux — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:36:00 +0000

OK, consider using ruote 2.0 then.

http://ruote.rubyforge.org/
http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/tree/ruote2.0

Best regards,

Comment on state machine != workflow engine by patfrat

patfrat — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:24:18 +0000

Now, with this “declarative workflow” engine, if i want to build a “workflow application”, i have to build a wysiwyg form builder, a wysiwyg workflow definition builder with an authentification engine (Authlogic+Authorization or something else …)
Why not ?
I will try ruote as soon as possible with my current projects to learn it …
Thank you for your work !